In order to beat the Winter Blahs, the Library and Technology Staff challenged the faculty and staff to set a personal technology learning goal. We emailed the following to members of our school community:

Make and Keep a Technology New Year’s Resolution

New Year’s Day is a great time to set new goals and start creating new habits.

Did you set a personal technology learning goal for the New Year?

Did you receive a new camera for the holidays and you need to learn how to download or edit the pictures?

Is there a technology topic, such as setting up a course in Moodle, creating a Google Custom Search, how to create a digital story using PhotoStory or VoiceThread, how to use Microsoft OneNote, create a screencast using Jing, that you would like to learn?

Would you like to learn how to use additional features of NoodleBib?

Interested in how to access and edit Discovery Streaming Videos for use in your classes,  that you have heard about or seen and want to spend the time exploring and learning?

For the past two Tuesdays, we have had 7% of our faculty and staff stop by at our informal Technology Resolution sessions. (This does represent a rate of return than is typically achieved by direct mail response) During these sessions, we guide and mentor the faculty and staff towards their goal. It has been extremely successful and rewarding. The faculty and staff who are coming have technology skills which run the spectrum from being what I would consider our most adept users of technology to those who have been apprehensive.

They have wanted to learn how to:

• Add websites and files to their Moodle course
• Download their pictures from their camera so that they don’t have to rely on their children to do so
• Set up a blog
• Set up a flickr account and upload pictures
• Create an group email, to email parents of sports teams, neighborhood, etc.
• Learn how to create the class push page
• Learn how to create a PowerPoint presentation

What is great is that in each of these cases, the individual created a personal learning goal which was not directly related to what they do in the classroom or as a part of their job description. However, in each case, the individual learned something that they have been able to transfer to what they do as a part of their job or in their classroom. This is higher order transfer of skills.

We have two more sessions that we have advertised and we are trying to figure out how to maintain the momentum while keeping the concept fresh. I am really excited about what the model and how we have grown the offerings.

The introduction to the white paper states:

Digital media and online communication have become pervasive in the lives of youth in the United States. Social network sites, online games, video-sharing sites, and gadgets such as iPods and mobile phones are now fixtures of youth culture. They have so permeated young lives that it is hard to believe that less than a decade ago these technologies had barely registered in the lives of U.S. children and teens. Today’s youth may be coming of age and struggling for autonomy and identity as did their predecessors, but they are doing so amid reconfigured contexts for communication, friendship, play, and self-expression.

and

Our values and norms in education, literacy, and public participation are being challenged by a shifting landscape of media and communications in which youth are central actors. Although complaints about “kids these days” have a familiar ring to them, the contemporary version is somewhat unusual in how strongly it equates generational identity with technology identity, an equation that is reinforced by telecommunications and digital media corporations that hope to capitalize on this close identification.

My highlights from the white paper report:

Once teens find a way to be together—online, offline, or both—they integrate new media within the informal hanging-out practices that have characterized their social worlds. This ready availability of multiple forms of media, in diverse contexts of everyday life, means that media content is increasingly central to everyday communication and identity construction

Through participation in social network sites such as MySpace, Facebook, and Bebo (among others) as well as instant and text messaging, young people are constructing new social norms and forms of media literacy in networked public culture that reflect the enhanced role of media in their lives. The networked and public nature of these practices makes the “lessons” about social life (both the failures and successes) more consequential and persistent.

Young people use new media to build friendships and romantic relationships as well as to hang out with each other as much and as often as possible. This sense of being always on and engaged with one’s peers involves a variety of practices. This keeps friends up-to-date with the happenings in different people’s lives.

In addition to changes in how romantic relationships develop, the integration of Friends into the infrastructure of social network sites has transformed the meaning of “friend” and “friendship”.

Although young people tend to avoid their parents and other adults while using social network sites and IM programs, much of their new media engagement occurs in the context of home and family life.

Unlike hanging out, in which the desire is to maintain social connections to friends, messing around represents the beginning of a more intense, media-centric form of engagement. When messing around, young people begin to take an interest in and focus on the workings and content of the technology and media themselves, tinkering, exploring, and extending their understanding. Some activities that we identify as messing around include looking around, searching for information online, and experimentation and play with gaming and digital media production. Messing around is often a transitional stage between hanging out and more interest-driven participation.

Messing around with digital media is driven by personal interest, but it is supported by a broader social and technical ecology, where the creation and sharing of media is a friendship-driven set of practices. Online sites for storing and circulating personal media are facilitating a growing set of options for sharing. Youth no longer must carry around photo albums to share photos with their friends and families; a MySpace profile or a camera phone will do the trick.

This then leads to the following conclusions and implications:

Participation in the digital age means more than being able to access “serious” online information and culture; it also means the ability to participate in social and recreational activities online. Although public institutions do not necessarily need to play a role in instructing or monitoring kids’ use of social media, they can be important sites for enabling participation in these activities and enhancing their scope. Rather than seeing socializing and play as hostile to learning, educational programs could be positioned to step in and support moments when youth are motivated to move from friendship-driven to more interest-driven forms of new media use.

In addition to economic barriers, youth encounter institutional, social, and cultural constraints
to online participation. Fluent and expert use of new media requires more than simple, task-specific access to technology. Sporadic, monitored access at schools and libraries may provide sufficient access for basic information seeking, but is insufficient for the immersed kind of social engagements with networked publics that are becoming a baseline for participation on both the interest-driven and the friendship-driven sides.

Networked publics provide a context for youth to develop social norms in negotiation with their peers.
Young people are turning to online networks to participate in a wide range of public activities and developing social norms that their elders may not recognize. Given constraints on time and mobility, online sites offer young people the opportunity to casually connect with their friends and engage in private communication that is not monitored by parents and teachers. On the interest-driven side, youth turn to networked publics to connect with like-minded peers who share knowledge and expertise that may not be available to them locally.

The problem lies not in the volume of access but the quality of participation and learning, and kids and adults should first be on the same page on the normative questions of learning and literacy.

Youth are developing new forms of media literacy that are keyed to new media and youth-centered social and cultural worlds. It is important to understand the diverse genre conventions of youth new media literacy before developing educational programs in this space. Particularly when addressing learning and literacy that grows out of informal, peer-driven practices, we must realize that norms and standards are deeply situated in investments and identities of kids’ own cultural and social worlds.

Peer-based learning has unique properties that suggest alternatives to formal instruction. Peer-based learning is characterized by a context of reciprocity, where participants feel they can both produce and evaluate knowledge and culture. When these peer negotiations occur in a context of public scrutiny, youth are motivated to develop their identities and reputations through these peer-based networks, exchanging comments and links and jockeying for visibility. These efforts at gaining recognition are directed at a network of respected peers rather than formal evaluations of teachers or tests. In contrast to what they experience under the guidance of parents and teachers, with peer-based learning we see youth taking on more “grown-up” roles and ownership of their own self-presentation, learning, and evaluation of others.

In contexts of peer-based learning, adults can still have an important role to play, though it is not a conventionally authoritative one. A “pedagogy of collegiality” that defines adult-youth collaboration in what youth see as successful youth media programs.

Rather than assuming that education is primarily about preparing for jobs and careers, what would it mean to think of education as a process of guiding kids’ participation in public life more generally, a public life that includes social, recreational, and civic engagement? And finally, what would it mean to enlist help in this endeavor from an engaged and diverse set of publics that are broader than what we traditionally think of as educational and civic institutions?

There are many points to ponder and ideas to develop around these ideas. The researchers have done a great job communicating this new culture. It is now up to us adults to determine how we can partner and shape this new landscape to best prepare today’s youth.

]]> http://vvrotny.org/2008/11/21/living-and-learning-with-new-media-report-released/feed/ 1 http://vvrotny.org/2008/11/21/life-magazine-photo-archive-hosted-by-google/ http://vvrotny.org/2008/11/21/life-magazine-photo-archive-hosted-by-google/#comments Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:47:40 +0000 vvrotny http://vvrotny.org/?p=260 You can now access millions of photographs from the Life Magazine photo archives in a Google Image Search. Google, in partnership with Life has now made these photographs, many which have never been published available.

You can access these images by either going to http://images.google.com/hosted/life or by adding “source:life” to any Google image search.

These images are quality and can now be used for inclusion in many digital story-telling projects.

You see, I work at an independent school which belongs to the Independent Schools of the Central States (ISACS). To maintain membership as an ISACS school and more importantly, as a tool for growth, each school is asked to participate in an analytical review process every seven years. This self-reflection is one which is often loathed for the time and energy that it takes to go through. However, when done right, this process can help a school identify both what their strengths are so that they can continue to build on those. Each school also identifies its weaknesses with plans on how they are going to tackle that challenge.

It is now my job to simply go and observe and interact with the faculty, holding up the mirror to verify that the image that they created is accurate and not skewed. I have 48 hours to peel away the layers to make sure that they have reflected their core. During this process, I will also gain a new lens and perspective which to apply to the way that I view my school. I will be able to bring back ideas, but more importantly new ways to look at both the way that me and my department look at the challenges that we have and allow us to apply our strengths to help resolve our challenges.

The culminating artifact which will be produced is a written document which will then be provided to the school administration. Not only do we have only 48 hours to observe and confirm the picture, but we need to write our reflections for the school to process. It is an intense project and the final report was one that I used to dread. However, since I have begun to use this space to reflect on my ideas and the projects that I work on, I am finding the process to be much simpler. I am already in the habit of partially stepping outside myself to assess and reflect what I am doing.

What would  be interesting would be to produce a mini-documentary, or to provide images which we could use to show our views of what they are doing, we have to produce a document which can be easily accessed by the administration, who unfortunately is more are text based learners. Maybe in the upcoming years, as more schools provide opportunities for students to engage in these ways of creating a story, when they begin to be part of the process as adult teachers, they will push us for the opportunity to use different modalities to tell the story as well.

Now that I have emptied my head and documented my thoughts, I better catch some more sleep so that I will be able to be alert and ready for the morning. It will be here before I want it to be.

Each team has a leader, who organizes the efforts of the group of educators who evaluate the school. When I got my first email from the leader our team, I saw the name of the leader and knew there was something that about this person which seemed familiar, but I could not put my figure it out.

The head of school in charge is Peter Fayorian, the head of school at the Greenhills School in Ann Arbor. Not a common name. I liked the tone of his email and knew that I would love the style in which he would lead the team. But I still couldn’t figure out what was bugging me about him.

Last night, it hit me, maybe this was the same person who I had gone to Middle School and High School with, even did a few science projects in his basement in the 9th Grade. We were in the same classes, but ran in different groups. In a large public high school, with a graduating class of 750+, it might have been. I thought the name was the same. But since I moved the day after graduation, I have lost track of most of my high school classmates.

I got my old yearbook out, and yes, the name was spelled the same. Upon Googling him, I couldn’t quite connect the dots. When I did a Google image search, found a picture which led to an article that confirmed that in fact he is the same person I went to school with for six years.

We will have some catching up to do. I wonder if he is aware of the connection?

1. Making sure teachers are aware of new tools so that they can become competent users of technology for themselves.
2. Making sure teachers can use these tools to enrich and transform their classroom for the community of learners during that physical time and space.

To date, we have employed following methods:

1. Using email/blog to make teachers aware of different tools and sites. We sometimes use this in a broad sweep, sometimes in a targeted fashion. This is a passive activity which requires a large amount of time and energy to follow up with those who are not self-motivated or feel overwhelmed.
2. Use of Large Group Meeting time. These times are often used to either show the whole group a set of tools or to provide a vision or direction. This then requires individual follow-up to make sure that the tools are implemented. Good for exposure,but does not lead to inclusion or change without a self-motivated individual taking control of their own learning. It is difficult to schedule as much time with the competing factions and needs for a whole group meeting.
3. Meet with Small Groups. These are often effective and more narrowly focused meetings which allow for greater rates of teachers being willing to experiment, play, and then embed the use of the tools for both personal and for inclusion in teaching. These are effective since different groups can be built, a group from a department, a grade level, a group with a common interest. The difficulty is carving out times for these groups to get together. It is very difficult during the school day and either before and after school. Our Brown Bag Lunches were a good example of this, but the differing lunch times and different divisional timetables makes this difficult time to schedule.
4. One-to-one – This is often the most effective, but most time intensive from a tech staffing standpoint. It requires that we know the goals of the teachers so we can align it with the right tools. I am spending more time this year developing these relationships. Once trained, I am asking the individuals to help serve as mentors for the tools. I want to do this because I believe that teachers need to hear authentic stories from their colleagues in addition to hearing my voice. They will be more likely to try when they hear the passion from more people.
5. Encouraging people to take advantage of wonderful opportunities online. This has been more miss than hit, as once again, it takes a highly motivated individual to make happen.

What I need is your guidance. Specifically:

1. Are there other methods that I should use that you think will be affective?
2. How can we rethink time so that we can facilitate more regular small group meetings?
3. Do you think that putting this in a virtual space (Moodle, etc.) would be helpful in providing access that is not time dependent?
4. Is there anything else I am completely missing in this conversation?

I look forward to hearing the thoughts and ideas from members of my network.

• Campus Wide Long Range Space Planning
• Questioning of Schedule and Time in all three of our divisions
• Discussion of the role of technology – tablets, laptops, projectors, network, and services to support learning

These conditions are converging, suggesting that we are nearing a near perfect storm that potentially could transform our learning environments and provide us with the framework which will enable us to enter into our second century of existence in 11 years. I am really excited about the possibilities.

Our Head of School has been interested in the Harkness Table concept. He has been dropping this idea into conversations for nearly a year now. As we are getting closer to our next milestone in determing whether or not we will be heading to a school environment in which technology will be “like oxygen, ubiquitous, necessary, and invisible” (Chris Lehmann in School 2.0 – Creating Schools We Need). Last night, I had an epiphany moment connecting this initiative and the Harkness Philosophy. The Harkness Philosophy can be updated for the new learning environment.

Embedded is a presentation which is I am developing the connection between the technology, learning environments, and the updates needed to provide for the Harkness Table 2.0. The changes are not in the physical realm, but instead extend to the collaborative network. I would appreciate any feedback or pushback from my network so that I can continue the development of these ideas. This is a work in progress, so I will be updating it over the next week.

With the advent of Web 2.0 technologies led me to begin to look for an equivilent solution so that multiple people could work on the same project. Many offered some of the tools and functionality of Inspiration, none of them had the full sets of features available.

At NECC, I heard the rumors that Inspiration was coming out with a web 2.0 edition of their product. I was excited about the possibilities and anxiously awaited its arrival. This morning, while scanning my reader, I saw a post by Kevin Jarrett (Inspiration comes to the web: meet MyWebspiration.com!) and I became excited.

Over the course of the day, I have begun to play with myWebspiration.com. Truly a beta product, it does not have full Web 2.0 functionality. It does have the ability for a group to collaborate, but unlike the Google products that I have been using, only one person can be editing the document at a time. There is not the ability to embed the document. The only way to access the document is to save a copy to your local hard drive and further manipulate it in Inspiration 8.

It does allow for all of the features I have come to love, such as rapid entry and the ability to switch between visual mode and outline mode. From Leigh Zeitz, I hear that this product will stay in beta and available for free for an undetermined amount of time while they are testing the waters.

It is a solid start and I look forward to seeing enhancements in the upcoming months. It is a something to watch develop and grow.

The first student said, “Don’t forget that we were just asked to include a print source for our research project.”

At this, the student replied, “I have that covered. Mine is Gordon Color. (the name of the printer that they could print to)”

Therein lies the dilemma we face as educators.

Learners in the 21st Century need to:

To begin, we have to agree with others that there is a problem and what the problem is.

To solve the problem identified, we had to decide in consultation with others what we feel is the  right question.

Once the right question is identified, a solution needs to be determined. Learners will collaborate with others whose thinking is different than theirs, to make sure that they are pushed to their solution.

Once a solution has been determined, it has to be applied and tested to make sure that it solves the problem.

If it works great, onward to the next problem. If not, we need to go back and see if we were asking the right question, or if we got the best solution in the first place. We go back and modify and start over again.